Warning: Undefined array key "language" in /customers/3/0/2/riff-raff.se/httpd.www/wiki/lib/tpl/old_sic/my_tpl_helper.php on line 129
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision
Previous revision
|
Last revision
Both sides next revision
|
en:riff-raff:introduction_to_riff-raff8 [Y-m-dH:i]
titorelli |
en:riff-raff:introduction_to_riff-raff8 [Y-m-dH:i]
titorelli |
| This disquisition of the Mill game is of value in context because TC makes such a big deal about it and they think that it sheds light on an important problematic. The analogy is used to illustrate a picture of //the whole of the capitalist mode of production and the reproduction of its classes//, its //self-presupposition//. How does this reproduction come about? | This disquisition of the Mill game is of value in context because TC makes such a big deal about it and they think that it sheds light on an important problematic. The analogy is used to illustrate a picture of //the whole of the capitalist mode of production and the reproduction of its classes//, its //self-presupposition//. How does this reproduction come about? |
| |
| //The whole// contests according to Marx of ‘the reproduction and new production of //the relation of capital and labour itself//…’, between the working class and the capitalist class. TC insists on that it is via Marx’s //concept of exploitation//, that is to say the conditions for the extraction of surplus labour, that makes it possible to illuminate how the capitalist society and its class contradictions are reproduced as a totality and expressed as such. | //The whole// consists according to Marx of ‘the reproduction and new production of //the relation of capital and labour itself//…’, between the working class and the capitalist class. TC insists on that it is via Marx’s //concept of exploitation//, that is to say the conditions for the extraction of surplus labour, that makes it possible to illuminate how the capitalist society and its class contradictions are reproduced as a totality and expressed as such. |
| |
| > Exploitation, which is the content of the relation, can be deconstructed into three moments: the selling and purchasing of labour power; capital’s subsumtion of labour; the transformation of the surplus-value into additional capital, i.e. to new transformed means of production and new, transformed labour power. ((Théorie communiste, ‘A reply to Aufheben’, p. 164)) | > Exploitation, which is the content of the relation, can be deconstructed into three moments: the selling and purchasing of labour power; capital’s subsumtion of labour; the transformation of the surplus-value into additional capital, i.e. to new transformed means of production and new, transformed labour power. ((Théorie communiste, ‘A reply to Aufheben’, p. 164)) |